俱舍論疏 19.233

19.233

論「反詰記者至無便求非」，述第三記。若有諂心請問，意欲求非，應但反問不須分別，問責其源默然而住。或反問，令其自記無便求非。為兩釋，非對二人。

Regarding the treatise passage from "A counter-questioning answer is" to "having no opening to seek fault": this relates the third answer. If someone asks with deceitful intentions, intending to seek fault, one should merely counter-question without needing to analyze, interrogating and censuring their premise so that they remain silent. Or one counter-questions, causing them to answer for themselves so they have no opportunity to seek fault. These are two interpretations, not addressed to two different persons.