俱舍論疏 19.234

19.234

論「豈不二中至成問記耶」，難也。本宗釋其問記，今言請故非問，反詰故非記。如何名分別、反詰二問記耶？

Regarding the treatise passage: "Is it not that among the two ... constitute question and answer?": this is a challenge. The root school explains their questions and answers; now it says that because of entreaty it is not a question, and because of counter-questioning it is not an answer. How can they be called the two question-answers of analysis and counter-questioning?