俱舍論疏 19.26

19.26

論「欲貪隨眠至徵問亦爾」，兩關徵問。經部師宗現行名纏，種名隨眠。大眾部等隨眠體是不相應行，即是欲貪之隨眠。有部欲貪即隨眠。前二屬主，有部持業。

Regarding the treatise from "the anuśaya of sensual desire... up to... the interrogation is also like this", this is an inquiry with two alternatives. The Sautrāntika school holds that the active manifestation is called entanglement (paryavasthāna), while the seed is called anuśaya. For the Mahāsāṃghika and others, the substance of anuśaya is a conditioning factor disassociated from thought (citta-viprayukta-saṃskāra); that is, it is the anuśaya of sensual desire [a genitive tatpuruṣa]. For the Sarvāstivādin (Vaibhāṣika), sensual desire is itself the anuśaya [a karmadhāraya]. The former two are genitive compounds; the Vaibhāṣikas use appositional compounds.