俱舍論疏 19.29

19.29

論「若欲貪體至并隨眠斷」，此與有部出違經言。於欲貪，經說能正遣除并隨眠斷，由體各別故有「并」言。若纏即隨眠，何須「并」字？

Regarding the treatise from "If the substance of sensual desire... up to... abandoned together with the anuśaya", this points out a contradiction with the scriptures against the Sarvāstivādins. Regarding sensual desire, the sūtra states that it can be correctly eliminated and abandoned together with its anuśaya; because their substances are distinct, the word 'together with' is used. If entanglement were itself anuśaya, why would the word 'together with' be necessary?