俱舍論疏 2.43

2.43

論「隨彼諸根至男根應有」，先釋彼反難也。契經所說不減諸根，隨彼地諸根多少皆悉具有，無減根者。如是釋經，何所相違？若許隨有諸根不減，即令如於欲界具有根者不減諸根。若然者，於彼上界男根應有。

On the Śāstra's: "According to whichever faculties there are... the male faculty should exist": this first resolves their counter-objection. What the sūtra states about "not deficient in faculties" means that according to however many faculties belong to that level, they are fully possessed of all of them, and have none deficient. If the sūtra is explained in this way, what contradiction is there? If you allow that "not deficient" means according to whatever faculties exist, you would make it so that just as beings in the desire realm possess all faculties and are not deficient in faculties, so too in that higher realm the male faculty should exist.