俱舍論疏 2.44

2.44

論「如是說者至男根非有」，論主評也。「以六根愛依內身生，非依境界而得現起」者，即緣六根愛，即有緣自身起，不緣境生。由有因故，有鼻、舌根。其男根體即是身根一分，能觸婬境，名為男根。此之愛生必因境愛，非如鼻、舌依內根處總起身愛。由此上界有內身愛，鼻、舌非無；無婬境愛，男根非有。餘文可解。

On the Śāstra's: "The proper explanation is... the male faculty is non-existent": this is the author's critique. Regarding "Because craving for the six faculties arises dependent upon the internal body, and is not manifested dependent upon objective spheres": that is, craving that takes the six faculties as object arises dependent on one's own body, and does not arise dependent on external objects. Because the cause exists, the nose and tongue faculties exist. As for the entity of the male faculty, it is merely a portion of the body faculty that is capable of tactile contact with the sexual object, and is termed the male faculty. The arising of this craving necessarily depends on craving for the object, unlike the nose and tongue which, depending on the loci of internal faculties, give rise to a general craving for the body. Therefore, because in the higher realm there is craving for the internal body, the nose and tongue are not non-existent; but because there is no craving for sexual objects, the male faculty is non-existent. The rest of the text is intelligible.