俱舍論疏 20.180

20.180

論「能取諸有至合立為取」，答也。取諸有故名之為取。由無明不了相，故彼非能取。及非猛利故，但可與餘合立為取。已上依有部釋。

Regarding the treatise's statement from "Being able to seize existences" to "are combined and established as clinging": This is the answer. Because they seize existences, they are called clingings. Because ignorance has the characteristic of non-comprehension, it is not an active grasper. And because it is not acute, it can only be combined with the rest and established as clinging. The above is explained according to the Vaibhāṣika school.