俱舍論疏 20.181

20.181

論「然契經說至應知亦爾」，此述經部宗也。「欲軛云何」，經中問也。「謂諸欲中」者，謂眾多貪欲之中，或諸五欲境中，欲貪至纏壓於心者。上明欲貪眾名纏於心。明欲貪過患，是名欲軛，經說貪名軛也。經中說眾名者，示多過患。有軛、見軛應知亦爾，亦以欲貪為體。故《正理》云「此於愛體說三軛名。然唯言三者，無明軛等似言以無明為體。」

Regarding the treatise's statement from "However, a sūtra states" to "should be understood to be likewise": This recounts the Sautrāntika tenet. "What is the yoke of desire?": this is the question in the sūtra. "Namely, among sensual desires": this means that among the numerous desires, or among the objective fields of the five desires, sensual craving and so forth entangle and oppress the mind. The above explains that the numerous names for sensual desire entangle the mind. Clarifying the faults of sensual desire is called the yoke of desire; the sūtra calls desire a yoke. The multiple names spoken in the sūtra demonstrate its many faults. The yoke of existence and the yoke of views should be understood to be likewise, also having sensual desire as their intrinsic nature. Therefore the Nyāyānusāra states: "Here, the names of the three yokes are spoken with respect to the entity of craving. However, in speaking of only three, the yoke of ignorance and so forth seem to be spoken of as having ignorance as their intrinsic nature."