俱舍論疏 20.85

20.85

論「又若彼色至乃至廣說」，經部條有部轉計破也。又若去、來色同現在有，唯有極微散亂為異，即極微色無聚、散故應是其常。「又色唯應極微聚散，竟無少分別名生滅，是則遵崇邪命者論」，三同外道過也。「棄背善逝至乃至廣說」，四違經過也。

The Śāstra says: "Furthermore, if that matter... up to and including the broad explanation": the Sautrāntikas systematically refute the Sarvāstivādins' alternative hypothesis. Furthermore, if past and future matter exist identically to the present, differing only in the dispersion of subtle atoms, then subtle atoms of matter, lacking aggregation and dispersion, would have to be eternal. "Furthermore, matter would only be the aggregation and dispersion of subtle atoms, with no distinction whatsoever called arising and ceasing; in that case, one would be revering the treatises of the Ājīvikas"—this is the third fault, that of agreeing with non-Buddhists. "Turning one's back on the Sugata... up to and including the broad explanation"—this is the fourth fault, that of contradicting the sūtras.