俱舍論疏 20.98

20.98

論「若異此者至或有差別」，經部出異經部計，不許有緣無識過。若一切覺皆有所緣，既稱境知，何緣得為有為無猶豫不定？或言是色、非色差別。

The Śāstra says: "If it were otherwise... or there would be distinctions": the Sautrāntikas point out the fault of views divergent from the Sautrāntikas that disallow a consciousness taking non-existence as an object. If every cognition has an intentional object, since it corresponds to the object known, on what grounds could there be hesitation and indecision as to whether it exists or does not exist? Or it is said that there are distinctions between matter and non-matter.