俱舍論疏 21.133
俱舍論疏 21.133
- Language
- Classical Chinese
21.133
論「以何因緣至非見所斷」,問也。何故見斷無為兩界合立為三,修道無為兩界各立為一?
The treatise says: "For what reason […] not for what is abandoned through seeing?": this is the question. Why are the unconditioned [cessations] of what is abandoned through seeing established jointly for the two realms as three, while the unconditioned [cessations] of the path of cultivation are established separately for the two realms as one each?
Translations (1)
- English (machine translation) — English, machine translation