俱舍論疏 23.190

23.190

論「有言彼往餘道出家」，第二釋也。《正理》破云「理不應然。往餘道者，由惡見力邪業轉故。」准此，不破論主，破餘師也。

The treatise says, "Some say they go to other paths to leave household life." This is the second explanation. The *Nyāyānusāra* refutes it, saying: "Logically it should not be so. Those who go to other paths do so because improper actions operate due to the power of wrong views." Based on this, it is not refuting the author of the treatise, but refuting other masters.