俱舍論疏 25.38

25.38

論「雖皆如是至與修斷別」，釋也。雖皆以諦為境不如實知，而有差別。以修斷惑各永有可意、不可意別，於所緣境此相非無，名為有事。見所斷惑計我斷、常，非諸諦境有我等相，與修道別，名為無事。

On the Śāstra's statement: "Although all are like this ... distinct from what is abandoned by cultivation": This is the explanation. Although all take the truths as their domain without knowing them as they truly are, there is a distinction. Because each of the defilements abandoned by cultivation permanently involves the distinction of agreeable and disagreeable, and this characteristic is not non-existent with respect to the cognized object, they are called "having an objective fact". The defilements abandoned by seeing impute a self, annihilation, or permanence, but the domain of the truths does not have the characteristics of a self and so on; thus, being distinct from the path of cultivation, they are called "without an objective fact".