俱舍論疏 25.43

25.43

論「又見斷惑至名依有事」，此以理為無事，事為有事也。因釋見惑不退，廣有事、無事惑。

On the Śāstra's statement: "Furthermore, the defilements abandoned by seeing ... are called relying on what has an objective fact": Here, principle (yukti) is taken as "without an objective fact", and concrete fact (vastu) as "having an objective fact". By explaining why the defilements of seeing do not fall away, it expands upon defilements having and lacking an objective fact.