俱舍論疏 26.207

26.207

論「無學修通至與練根同」，明無學修通也。「無間現修如學」者，同緣事故，未來修異，鈍加盡智，利兼無生故。「解脫加行現修如學」者，若有學、若無學，皆不以盡、無生為解脫加行故。未來有異，鈍加盡智，利兼無生故。勝進與無學練根同。

[On] the treatise's: "The non-learner cultivating the superknowledges … up to: are the same as [those of] refining the faculties": this explains the cultivation of superknowledges by a non-learner. As for "the uninterrupted path's actual cultivation is like that of the learner": this is because they share in taking concrete facts as their object. In future [cultivation] there is a difference: a dull [faculty practitioner] adds the knowledge of destruction, while a sharp [faculty practitioner] additionally has [the knowledge of] non-arising. As for "the actual cultivation of the preparatory and liberation paths is like that of the learner": this is because whether one is a learner or a non-learner, neither uses the knowledge of destruction or non-arising as the preparatory path of liberation. In the future there is a difference: a dull [practitioner] adds the knowledge of destruction, and a sharp [practitioner] additionally includes non-arising. The advanced path is identical to the non-learner's refining of the faculties.