俱舍論疏 26.77
俱舍論疏 26.77
- Language
- Classical Chinese
26.77
論「雖說非理至是散心故」，西方師通前難也。雖說眠相應染心，亦聚亦散過。我西方師不說眠相應染心為散心，但名聚心，復有何過？
On the Śāstra's statement: "Although it was said to be illogical […] because it is a distracted mind": the Western masters resolve the earlier objection. Although they said there is the fault of a defiled mind associated with sleepiness being both collected and distracted, we Western masters do not speak of a defiled mind associated with sleepiness as being a distracted mind, but only call it a collected mind; what further fault is there?
Translations (1)
- English (machine translation) — English, machine translation
Linked texts (1)
- 俱舍論記 — Classical Chinese