俱舍論疏 28.123

28.123

論「若謂外散至三摩地故」，通有部難也。有部難言：若以有輕安風，即令爾時有身識者，定應失壞。通云：此順定故，不失壞定。

On the treatise passage: "If it is said that outward distraction [...] because of samādhi": this resolves the Sarvāstivādin's objection. The Sarvāstivādin objected: "If the presence of the wind of pliancy causes body-consciousness to exist at that time, absorption would inevitably be destroyed." The resolution states: "Because this conforms to absorption, it does not destroy absorption."