俱舍論疏 28.130

28.130

論「若謂順彼至許如是說」，引例破也。汝豈不說是隨順覺支名覺支也。我宗身識亦順無漏，故名為無漏，無違理失。

On the treatise passage: "If it is said that conforming to that [...] it is accepted to be spoken of in this way": this refutes by citing a parallel example. Do you not say that conforming to the factors of awakening is called a factor of awakening? In my school, body-consciousness also conforms to the anāsrava, hence it is designated anāsrava; there is no error of contradicting reasoning.