俱舍論疏 29.130

29.130

論「若謂所說至或依止義」，破轉計。若謂即以俱生或依止義名火依薪。非因薪者，即應說補特伽羅與蘊俱生或依止蘊，違自立宗云不一異也。

On the Śāstra's statement: "If you say that what is spoken of […] or the meaning of resting upon": This refutes a shifted position. If you say that precisely by the meaning of simultaneous arising or resting upon, it is called 'fire dependent on fuel', and not caused by fuel, then one should say that the pudgala arises simultaneously with the aggregates or rests upon the aggregates, which contradicts your own established school's claim that they are neither identical nor different.