俱舍論疏 29.147

29.147

論「若說諸色至色異眼等」，破色為了我因。於眼等了於諸色，色與眼等條然體別。因於色等了我之時，因何我與色等而言不異？

On the Śāstra's statement: "If it is said that all forms […] form is different from the eye and so on": Refuting that form is the cause of cognising the self. In the eye and so forth one cognises forms, and form is clearly distinct in entity from the eye and so forth. When one cognises the self because of form and the rest, why is it said that the self is not different from form and the rest?