俱舍論疏 29.151

29.151

論「若彼救言至便壞自宗」，破轉救也。我之與色不一、異故，色、我能了亦不一、異者，破云：我非有為，可言與色等不一、不異；能了是有為法，如何得說非定一異？若許非有為者，便違自宗。

On the Śāstra's statement: "If they should rescue their position by saying […] it would destroy their own school": Refuting a shifted defense. If they claim that because the self and form are neither identical nor different, the cognisers of form and the self are also neither identical nor different, the refutation states: The self is not conditioned, so it might be said to be neither identical with nor different from form and the rest; but the cogniser is a conditioned phenomenon, so how could it be said to be neither definitely identical nor definitely different? If you accept that it is not conditioned, you contradict your own school.