俱舍論疏 29.166

29.166

論「諸謂眼見至惡見深坑」，釋犢子部云見我者，即是眼根見色所有之相。所以知然？於見非我謂見我故，彼便蹎墜惡見深坑。若於我見我，何名非我謂見我也。

The treatise says: "All who say they see with the eye... the deep pit of wrong view." This explains that what the Vātsīputrīyas call 'seeing the self' is simply the characteristics of visible form seen by the visual faculty. How is this known to be so? Because taking what is not-self as seeing a self, they tumble down into the deep pit of wrong view. If one saw a self upon what is a self, why would it be called taking what is not-self as seeing a self?