俱舍論疏 29.97

29.97

論「越此於餘豈無解脫」，此品之中自有二分：一正破我、二勸學無我。准諸經例，問非序分不可分三。就正破我中，復分為三：一總破別計實我、二破異部計我、三破異道計我。就前文中復分為二：一明執我過、二正明破執實我。就前文中復有四段：一問、二答、三徵、四釋。此文問也。越上品所明無我之理，別執實我，豈無解脫耶？

On the treatise's question, "Transcending this, is there no liberation in others?": Within this chapter there are naturally two parts: first, properly refuting the self; second, encouraging the study of non-self. According to the precedent of various sūtras, since a question is not the introductory section, it cannot be divided into three. Within the proper refutation of the self, it is further divided into three: first, generally refuting the separate positing of a real self; second, refuting the positing of a self by divergent sects; third, refuting the positing of a self by divergent paths. Within the preceding text, it is further divided into two: first, clarifying the faults of grasping a self; second, properly clarifying the refutation of grasping a real self. Within the preceding text, there are further four sections: first, the question; second, the answer; third, the interrogation; fourth, the explanation. This text is the question: transcending the principle of non-self clarified above and separately grasping a real self, is there indeed no liberation?