俱舍論疏 3.133
俱舍論疏 3.133
- Language
- Classical Chinese
3.133
論「若爾何故說彼為男」，難也。男、女二名由二根得；彼無男根，何故名男？
The commentary states: "If so, why are they called male?" This is an objection: The two designations 'male' and 'female' are obtained on account of the two faculties; since they lack the male faculty, why are they called male?
Translations (1)
- English (machine translation) — English, machine translation