俱舍論疏 4.239

4.239

論「如無記法至及後起得」，此明欲界善、不善色無法前得，唯法俱、法後，勢力不能引前得故。此色若在未來，未來得；若至現在，未來、現在得；若至過去，三世得。初無漏心及加行善最初起者，若在未來，未來得；若至現在，未來、現在得；若至過去，有三世得。餘法不同，思之可解。

[On the Śāstra's statement:] "Like neutral states [… and subsequent possession]," this clarifies that desire-realm wholesome and unwholesome form does not have prior possession; it only has simultaneous and subsequent possession, because its power is incapable of drawing forth prior possession. If this form is in the future, it has future possession; if it reaches the present, it has future and present possession; if it reaches the past, it has possession across the three time periods. The initial uncontaminated mind and the initial arising of preparatory wholesome states, if in the future, have future possession; if reaching the present, have future and present possession; if reaching the past, have possession across the three time periods. Other phenomena are not the same; reflecting on this, it can be understood.