俱舍論疏 5.15

5.15

論「又應顯成至由此發生」，第六難也。無差別同分如總同句義，差別同分如同異句義，或唯如同異句義？

On the text of the Treatise, "Furthermore, it would clearly result in... arising from this": This is the sixth objection. Does non-differentiated generic similarity correspond to the category of universal generality (sāmānya), while differentiated generic similarity corresponds to the category of generality-cum-particularity (sāmānya-viśeṣa)? Or does it correspond solely to the category of generality-cum-particularity?