俱舍論疏 5.260

5.260

論「然世尊說至安布差別」，通有部難。難云：若謂離聲無別名者，因何經說「頌依於名」？答云：即聲安布，假說為名。

On the Śāstra's statement: "However, the World-Honoured One stated [...] the distinction of arrangement": Resolving the Sarvāstivādin's objection. The objection says: If you say there is no separate name apart from sound, why did the sūtra state that 'verses rely on names'? The reply says: It is merely the arrangement of sounds that is nominally called a name.