俱舍論疏 6.219

6.219

論「豈不擇滅至應亦無常」，大眾部反難論主。經部擇滅亦擇故後有不生也。

[When] the treatise [states]: "Would not cessation through deliberation ... also be impermanent?" the Mahāsāṃghika counter-objects to the author of the treatise: "For the Sautrāntika, cessation through deliberation is also non-arising that exists later because of deliberation."