俱舍論疏 7.40

7.40

論「第四句者至生住異滅」，此非心等無間，是不相應故。非心無間，中間隔二定故。

On the Śāstra's statement: "As for the fourth alternative … arising, abiding, decay, and cessation": this is not equal-and-immediate to the mind, because it is non-concomitant. It is not immediate to the mind, because it is separated in between by the two absorptions.