俱舍論疏 8.178

8.178

論「已辨不成至亦非喻者」，結前起後非等。於中有二：一相續非相續非等、二由二緣不由二緣非等。

On the passage in the śāstra from "Having explained the unestablishedness" to "is also not an analogy": This concludes the preceding and introduces the subsequent point about non-equivalence. Within this there are two points: first, the non-equivalence of being a continuum versus not being a continuum; second, the non-equivalence of depending on two conditions versus not depending on two conditions.