俱舍論疏 8.189

8.189

論「又經說有至定非應理」，又引《七善士》證無中天，第五經也。如火星迸，近遠時處隨滅不同，別說中天豈有此異？執有中天，定非應理。

On the passage in the śāstra from "Furthermore, the sūtra speaks of" to "is definitely unreasonable": Furthermore, citing the Sūtra of the Seven Virtuous Persons to prove that there is no intermediate heaven is the fifth sūtra. Just as sparks fly forth and differ in extinguishing according to whether the time and place are near or far, if a distinct intermediate heaven were meant, how could there be such differences? To hold that there is an intermediate heaven is definitely unreasonable.