俱舍論疏 9.165

9.165

論「若爾無漏如何有為」，難也。若思異熟因力所造故名有為者，未來無漏既非異熟因所造，如何名有為？

On the Śāstra's statement: 'If so, how are uncontaminated [phenomena] conditioned?': this is an objection. If things are called conditioned because they are produced by the power of volition as a maturation cause, then since future uncontaminated [phenomena] are not produced by a maturation cause, how can they be called conditioned?