俱舍論疏 9.184

9.184

論「或有五蘊至即如所說」，經部引例證也。如或有羅漢無煩惱故即無有行，隨福行亦無、非福行亦無、不動行亦無，及結生識、愛、取、有等皆無。若不唯取此有彼有者，爾時亦具五蘊，何不名行乃至愛等？

On the Śāstra's statement: 'Or there are five aggregates, up to: exactly as stated': the Sautrāntikas cite an example as proof. For example, there may be an arhat who, because of the absence of defilements, has no formative factors—meritorious formative factors do not exist, non-meritorious formative factors do not exist, and unshakeable formative factors do not exist; consciousness that connects with rebirth, craving, clinging, existence, and so on are all absent. If one does not take solely 'this exists, so that exists', then at that time the five aggregates are also complete; why are they not called formative factors, up to craving and the rest?