俱舍論疏 9.209

9.209

論「謂未來世至亦說至緣」，論主取經部義答也。《正理》破云「非如是言能釋前難。以正起位許屬未來，彼宗未來猶未有體，至緣及起依何得成？故前所難無少行法有在起前先至於緣後時方起，非無作者可有用言，仍未通釋。」

The treatise says: "It refers to the future state [when it is about to be born] to [it is also said to reach conditions]." The treatise master answers by adopting the Sautrāntika doctrine. The Nyāyānusāra refutes this, saying: "Such words cannot resolve the previous objection. Because the stage of being about to arise is accepted as belonging to the future, and according to that school the future does not yet have substantial existence, upon what could reaching conditions and arising be established? Therefore, the previous objection—that there is no slight action that exists prior to arising, first reaching conditions and only later arising, and that without an agent there can be no talk of action—remains unresolved."