俱舍論疏 9.67

9.67

論「若爾何等我非所遮」，問也。若法假內，此有故彼有、此生故彼生，無有實我能為作者。我有二說：一實、二假。於二我中，何非所遮？

On the Śāstra's 'If so, what kind of self is not refuted?': this is a question. If within dharma-designation, when this exists, that exists, and when this arises, that arises, and there is no real self capable of acting as an agent, there are two assertions of self: first, real; second, nominal/designated. Between the two selves, which is not refuted?