俱舍論疏 26.60

26.60

On the Śāstra's statement: "If that is so, then there are minds […] free from delusion is also like this": the author of the Śāstra refutes this master's explanation. If one maintains that counteracting greed is called a mind free from greed, then unpolluted minds that do not counteract greed, because they are not associated with greed, would not be minds with greed; and because they do not counteract greed, they would not be minds free from greed. These two categories of mind would fail to encompass all minds. What other masters say is that because it is bound by greed it is called a mind with greed, and what is not bound by greed is called a mind free from greed. This then encompasses all minds completely; the cases of minds with delusion and so forth are also like this. The author of the Śāstra adopts this master['s view] as correct, and this by analogy also explains minds with hatred and delusion.