俱舍論疏 30.23

30.23

On the Śāstra's statement: "Because the Buddha has already refuted it [...] therefore the Buddha has already refuted it": The author of the Śāstra cites a sūtra to refute them. The Buddha said that when casting off these aggregates and continuing with other aggregates, except for the nominal designation based on the dharmas of the five aggregates, no continuity of aggregates is accepted; thus a separate self has already been refuted. When you claim a real self casts off and takes on aggregates, how could that not be refuted?