Pramāṇa · Search · About · API

俱舍論疏 4.13

English (machine translation) 4.13

Language
English

4.13

Furthermore, that Dharma Master Tai cited the Jñānaprasthāna and other treatises to refute Dharma Master Nian was a great error. Moreover, his own explanation that 'hence we know that the first master of the Vibhāṣā—that all four great elements are definitely not separated from visible form and sound, and all desire-realm visible form is definitely not separated from fragrance and taste—is the correct view' is an even greater error. It directly contradicts the Vibhāṣā's statement that there are four great elements without sound, and the eight [elements] without sound and so forth of this treatise and the Saṃyuktābhidharmahṛdaya. Since Dharma Master Nian's position conforms to the text of the treatise, the two masters, Tai and Guang, merely refuted him erroneously.

Linked texts (1)