瑜伽論記 1.203

1.203

所隨、依止性所隨、依附依止性者，此有多釋，三藏有兩解：一解：因相賴耶是種所隨，果相賴耶是依止性。又自相賴耶是名所隨，種子賴耶依附自相故名依附，果相賴耶熏名依止性。又解：本識相分名為所隨，見分名依止性，亦言所隨即因見分，依附等言說自體分。

Regarding 'that which is conformed to, that which is conformed to by nature as support, that which is conformed to by nature as dependent support', there are many explanations for this. The Tripiṭaka Master [Xuanzang] had two explanations. One explanation: The causal ālaya is that which is conformed to by the seeds; the resultant ālaya is that which is by nature the support. Furthermore, the ālaya as its own characteristic is named that which is conformed to; the seed ālaya depends upon its own characteristic, hence it is called dependent; the resultant ālaya's perfuming is named that which is by nature the support. Another explanation: The objective aspect (nimittabhāga) of the foundational consciousness is named that which is conformed to; the subjective aspect (darśanabhāga) is named that which is by nature the support. It is also said that 'that which is conformed to' refers to the causal subjective aspect, while words such as 'dependent' speak of the self-witnessing aspect (svasaṃvittibhāga).