瑜伽論記 1.349

1.349

雖有此說，今勘涅槃經，無欲、色字，彼經明二十一對諍論文云：或有中陰、或無中陰，準下文釋。汎言有中陰、無中陰，皆不解我意，所以者何？欲色界有，無色界無，非一向有無故，故為證不成。

Although there is this explanation, now examining the *Nirvāṇa Sūtra*, there are no words 'desire and form'; that sūtra, explaining twenty-one pairs of disputations, states in its text: 'Some say there is an intermediate state (antarābhava), some say there is no intermediate state.' Following the text below to explain it, the general statement that having an intermediate state or not having an intermediate state both do not understand my intention means: why is that? It is present in the desire and form realms, but absent in the formless realm; it is not categorically present or absent, and therefore using it as evidence is invalid.