瑜伽論記 10.309

10.309

第二、七支性罪一向不共，菩薩為物權行不犯。若因守戒闕利物大行者，亦名為犯，此一段文，舊論全無，飜譯偏脫。若依景師，此文還屬戒六中初。今尋文相亦可同景。然以遮性不同，故別取為一戒。於中，先總標，後別釋七。測云：此中殺生據大地菩薩說，若八地已上於一切時恒入觀故唯有善心殺生，七地已下有出入觀位故得有無記心殺，故非地前。

Second, the seven branches of innate offenses are purely unshared; when a bodhisattva acts through provisional means for the sake of beings, it is not an offense. If, on account of guarding morality, one neglects the great practice of benefiting beings, that is also called an offense. This entire passage is completely absent from the old treatise, having been omitted in translation. If one follows Master Jing, this passage still belongs to the first of the six regarding morality. Now, examining the phrasing of the text, one could also agree with Jing; however, because prescriptive and innate [offenses] differ, it is separately taken as one precept. Therein, first there is a general indication, and later an individual explanation of the seven. Ce says: Herein, killing is explained according to bodhisattvas on the great stages. If it is from the eighth bhūmi upward, because they constantly enter contemplation at all times, they kill only with a wholesome mind; from the seventh bhūmi downward, because they have states of entering and emerging from contemplation, they can kill with an indeterminate mind; therefore, it is not before the stages.