瑜伽論記 10.355

10.355

已下第二逐難重解，於中初簡聲聞戒。聲聞戒中，若犯四重於現身中，不可悔名無餘犯，今明菩薩戒捨而還受故云無無餘犯。明法師云：就前四他勝處法。第一、以食犯；第二、以慳犯；第三、瞋；第四、邪見。若邪見犯第四戒者不同，上中下皆失菩薩戒，若瞋犯第三戒，上中犯者即失，下品不失，若慳犯第二戒，上品即失，中下不失，若合三品犯第一戒者皆不失，聲聞不爾，故云菩薩無無餘犯。一解：聲聞戒中一切煩惱並犯戒，故云言無餘犯，菩薩戒中起貪煩惱或不犯，若利益有情貪不犯菩薩戒，為自利益即犯菩薩戒，若瞋煩惱為自為他並能犯戒，故云無無餘犯。明度無極經中，貪瞋相對分別失戒，瞋上品失戒，中下不失，貪三品犯不失戒。

From here on, the second [part] resolves difficulties and re-explains, within which it first distinguishes the śrāvaka precepts. Among the śrāvaka precepts, if one commits the four gravest offenses in one's present life, they cannot be repented, which is called an offense without remainder; now, clarifying the bodhisattva precepts, they can be relinquished and received again, hence it is said that there is no offense without remainder. Dharma Master Ming says: Concerning the preceding four grounds for defeat: the first is violated through [craving for] food; the second is violated through stinginess; the third is anger; the fourth is wrong view. If one violates the fourth precept through wrong view, it is different: in all cases, high, middling, and low, one loses the bodhisattva precepts; if one violates the third precept through anger, committing it in a high or middling degree causes loss, while the lowest degree does not cause loss; if one violates the second precept through stinginess, the highest degree causes loss, while middling and low do not cause loss; if one commits the first precept across all three degrees, none cause loss; the śrāvaka [precepts] are not like this, hence it is said that for bodhisattvas there is no offense without remainder. Another explanation is: among the śrāvaka precepts, all afflictions violate the precepts, hence it speaks of an offense without remainder; among the bodhisattva precepts, when the affliction of greed arises, it may not be a violation: if it is greed that benefits sentient beings, it does not violate the bodhisattva precepts; if it is for one's own benefit, it then violates the bodhisattva precepts; if it is the affliction of anger, whether for oneself or for others, it can always violate the precepts; hence it is said there is no offense without remainder. In the Mingdu wuji jing, greed and anger are contrasted to distinguish the loss of precepts: the highest grade of anger loses the precepts, while the middling and lower do not; violating through all three grades of greed does not lose the precepts.