瑜伽論記 10.356

10.356

次明須受分齊，多分應共瞋所起犯，非貪所起者，景云：起瞋犯戒，起貪不犯。若依舊論，如世尊說：菩薩起瞋，瞋惱犯應更受，非受貪欲犯。測云：問：前說四他勝處法中貪犯亦失，云何此非貪？答：若依舊論，但言染犯失戒非貪，是故前後相違。今依新論，既云：多分在瞋，即知貪犯亦失。是故前後兩文，不相違也。

Next, clarifying the limits of having to receive [the precepts again]: Regarding 'mostly caused by anger, not caused by greed': Jing says: Giving rise to anger violates the precepts; giving rise to greed does not violate them. If based on the old treatise, as the World-Honoured One said: 'When a bodhisattva gives rise to anger and resentment, the violation requires that they be received again, but not the violation of receiving sensual greed.' Ce says: Question: It was previously said that in the four grounds for defeat, violation through greed also entails loss; how is this not greed? Answer: If based on the old treatise, it only says that a violation through defilement loses the precepts, not greed; therefore, the earlier and later texts contradict each other. Now, based on the new treatise, since it says 'mostly in anger', one knows that violation through greed also entails loss. Therefore, the two texts, earlier and later, do not contradict each other.