瑜伽論記 11.163

11.163

若準下，如是菩薩於身等法不分別在等文，則亦不分別一切種類都無有性唯觀依他，遠離言說自性法性者則圓成實，今離言說言說不相稱不同依他。故下文言是四諦法性，法性則真如也，即不分別有性是遍計，不分別一切種類都無有性是依他，遠離言說自性法是圓成實也。

If we follow the text below, 'Thus the bodhisattva does not conceptualize presence with respect to dharmas such as the body', etc., then 'nor conceptualizing that all types are completely devoid of nature' contemplates only the paratantra, while 'far removed from verbal intrinsic nature, dharma-nature' is the pariniṣpanna; here, being free from verbal expression, verbal expression does not correspond to it, unlike the paratantra. Therefore the text below says, 'this is the dharma-nature of the four truths', dharma-nature being tathatā. Thus, not conceptualizing an existent nature is parikalpita; not conceptualizing that all types are completely devoid of nature is paratantra; and being far removed from verbal intrinsic nature is pariniṣpanna.