瑜伽論記 11.162

11.162

又於其身乃至如實了知者，此於依他法身法真如圓成實性如實了知，基云：不分別有性不為遍計執分別身有。不分別無性者，不分別依他圓成二性是無。又其身遠離言說自性法性等者，此重解圓成不起言說分別，真如是不可言說自性法性也。

Furthermore, 'with respect to that body [...] down to truly knowing': this is truly knowing the paratantra dharmakāya and the pariniṣpanna-svabhāva of dharma-tathatā. Ji says: Not conceptualizing an existent nature means not conceptualizing the body as existing through parikalpita grasping. Not conceptualizing a non-existent nature means not conceptualizing the two natures, paratantra and pariniṣpanna, as non-existent. Furthermore, 'that body is far removed from the verbal intrinsic nature, dharma-nature', etc., re-explains that in the pariniṣpanna verbal conceptualization does not arise, and tathatā is the ineffable intrinsic nature and dharma-nature.