瑜伽論記 11.434

11.434

第三釋難，難云：地前經於一僧祇劫伏惑淨修，云何不具淨勝意樂？故此通云：解行轉時雖小分清淨勝解而未得名清淨意樂，由為煩惱流污而轉，極歡喜住則不如是。

Third, resolving the objection: The objection asks: Prior to the grounds, having spent one asaṃkhyeya kalpa subduing defilements and purifying cultivation, why does one not possess pure and superior aspiration? Therefore this resolves it by saying: When practicing with resolute conviction operates, although there is a small portion of pure resolute conviction, it cannot yet be called pure aspiration, because it operates while being polluted by the flow of defilements; the Pramuditā abode, however, is not like this.