瑜伽論記 12.337

12.337

初云如理思惟汝之父母所為立名乃至於此有中如是言名想施設假立言說轉耶者，汝依父母師僧為汝立名，即隨此名執有實我，汝應思惟為離眼等六處別有自性真實之我，或離色等外處或雙離內外及離中間有此我體。於中有我如是名想施設假立言說轉耶？如是教觀離內外處都無有我名於中轉。

First, as for "properly reflecting on the names assigned by your parents... down to: does such conventional expression of names, concepts, and designations operate with respect to this existence?": relying on parents, teachers, and monks who assigned names for you, you immediately cling to a real self following this name. You should reflect: apart from the six internal sense-bases such as the eyes, is there a real self with its own intrinsic nature, or apart from the external sense-bases such as forms, or apart from both internal and external, or in between them, is there such an entity of a self? Within them, does such conventional expression of names, concepts, and designations of a self operate? Instructing such contemplation reveals that completely apart from internal and external sense-bases, no name of a self operates therein.