瑜伽論記 12.490

12.490

與所餘依，非相應非不相應者，景云：與初施設依五取蘊非相應已離諸取故，羅漢後身雖復離取身仍是取蘊之類非不相應，與彼第三住持依名非相應已離四食愛故，非不相應羅漢後身仍假四食支持住故。第六苦惱依名非相應不造惡業感苦因故，仍受宿業致苦報故，與彼第七適悅依名非相應以離靜慮貪定樂故，而有清淨離染定樂非不相應。

"With the remaining supports, neither conjoined nor not conjoined": Jing says: With the first support for designation, the five appropriation aggregates, they are not conjoined because they have already abandoned all appropriation; although the arhat's final body is free from appropriation, the body is still of the class of appropriation aggregates, so they are not non-conjoined. With that third support for maintenance, they are called not conjoined because they have already abandoned craving for the four nutriments; they are not non-conjoined because the arhat's final body still relies on the four nutriments for support and maintenance. With the sixth support of suffering, they are called not conjoined because they do not create evil karma that induces the cause of suffering; yet they still receive past karma that incurs painful retribution. With that seventh support of gratification, they are called not conjoined because they are free from craving for dhyāna and the pleasure of absorption; yet because they have pure, taintless pleasure of absorption, they are not non-conjoined.