瑜伽論記 12.80

12.80

解中，有十：一、初明十法成滿得入此住，如地經言：當以十平等法得入第六地，何等為十？一者、一切法無相平等故乃至廣說，今此中云謂於一切法，由有勝義自性平等性故乃至有無無二平等性故等者，如舊地持有一二等數標名，此論有十一故字，不可數之。且準舊論言：一者第一義自性平等，當此中第一由勝義自性無相平等性故，即當經第一一切法自性無相平等，此中意謂由緣勝義理故一切法平等。如舊論第二無言說行無相平等，當今云言說造作影像無相平等性故，當經言第二無想平等也。此中意謂一切言說造作影像等皆由想起，今此相亦無，無想平等也。於理本無相有是妄生故，如舊云三者無生平等，當今言即由此相自然不生平等性故，當經言無生平等。景言：即前依他因緣生法無自然生故名無生平等。基解：此意謂即由此心想無故自然無名苦生。

Within the explanations, there are ten: first, explaining the ten dharmas whose perfection allows entry into this abiding. As the Daśabhūmika Sūtra says: One should enter the sixth stage through ten dharmas of equality. What are the ten? First, because of the signless equality of all dharmas, and so on at length. Now here it says: That is, in all dharmas, because there is the equality of the ultimate intrinsic nature, up to the equality of the non-duality of existence and non-existence, and so forth. Whereas the old Bodhisattvabhūmi lists names with numbers like one, two, and so forth, this treatise has eleven occurrences of the word "because" (故), which cannot be counted in that manner. Taking the old treatise as a standard: first, the equality of the intrinsic nature of the ultimate truth corresponds here to the first, "because of the signless equality of the ultimate intrinsic nature", which corresponds in the sūtra to the first, "the equality of the intrinsic nature of all dharmas being signless"; the meaning here is that because one takes the ultimate principle as an object, all dharmas are equal. As the old treatise's second, "the signless equality of the activity of verbal designation", corresponds now to "because of the signless equality of verbal designation and constructed mental images", this corresponds in the sūtra to the second, "the equality of non-conception". The meaning here is that all verbal designation, construction, mental images, and so forth arise from conceptual thought; now these signs are also absent, which is the equality of non-conception. In principle, there are originally no signs, and their existence is falsely produced; hence, as the old [version] says, third, "the equality of non-production", this corresponds now to "because of the equality of this sign being naturally unproduced", which corresponds in the sūtra to "the equality of non-production". Jing says: The previously mentioned dharmas produced from other-dependent causes and conditions lack natural production; hence it is called the equality of non-production. Ji explains: The meaning of this is that precisely because this mental conceptualization is absent, the natural non-existence is called the production of suffering.