瑜伽論記 12.81

12.81

又即由此於言說造作依他性平等故執有自然生者，此自然不生但是因緣生故言無生平等無自然生也，前解為勝。如舊論言：四者因緣不超平等，當今因亦不生平等性故，當經云無成平等，今又云自然與因皆不生故者，雙牒前二句以起後也。經言：無成平等者，疏云以無生故亦無苦性，成起現前。

Furthermore, precisely because of this, with respect to verbal designation and construction, because the other-dependent nature is equal, those who grasp that there is natural production [are refuted]: this is not naturally produced, but is produced only from causes and conditions; therefore it is said to be the equality of non-production, lacking natural production. The former explanation is superior. As the old treatise says: fourth, "the equality of causes and conditions not being exceeded", which corresponds now to "because of the equality of causes also not being produced", which corresponds in the sūtra to "the equality of non-establishment". Now it also says, "because both nature and causes are not produced", which takes up both preceding clauses together to introduce what follows. The sūtra says: Regarding "the equality of non-establishment", the commentary says: because there is no production, there is also no nature of suffering established, arisen, or present.